Advancing Agribusiness through Systemic Approach: Linking Sectors, Resources, and Market Channels

Lovely Rose Caraecle; Abdani Bandera

doi:10.47134/jbea.v3i1.928

Authors

Lovely Rose B. Caraecle Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture, Mindanao State University-Main Campus, Marawi City, Philippines
Abdani D. Bandera Department of Agribusiness Management, College of Agriculture, Mindanao State University-Main Campus, Marawi City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jbea.v3i1.928

Keywords:

Agribusiness, Systemic Approach, Value Chains, Sector Linkages, Market Channels, Resources, Global South, Southeast Asia, Philippines, Inclusive Development, Institutional Coordination, Rural Transformation

Abstract

Agribusiness is a key driver of economic growth, food security, and rural livelihoods in developing countries, particularly in Southeast Asia and the Philippines, where it employs a significant portion of the labor force and supports domestic consumption, trade, and value chains. Traditional agricultural practices, however, face challenges in addressing globalization, climate variability, and inclusive economic growth. This study employs a qualitative, literature-based approach, synthesizing over forty peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and institutional publications from FAO, IFPRI, the World Bank, ADB, ASEAN, and SEARCA, to examine how a systemic framework—integrating sectoral linkages, resource mobilization, and market channels—can enhance agribusiness performance and sustainability. Findings highlight five critical dimensions: (1) sectoral linkages and integration, emphasizing horizontal and vertical networks that improve efficiency, resilience, and value creation; (2) resource mobilization and management, including sustainable natural resource use, financial inclusion, human capital development, and technological innovation; (3) market channel integration, encompassing formal and informal networks, digital platforms, and regional trade; (4) institutional and policy frameworks, with multi-stakeholder governance, regulatory alignment, and public-private partnerships; and (5) regional dynamics, showing varying system maturity across Southeast Asia. Comparative analysis indicates that Thailand and Vietnam demonstrate integrated, competitive agribusiness systems, while the Philippines remains fragmented. The study concludes that systemic approaches provide evidence-based strategies for building resilient, inclusive, and competitive agribusiness sectors, offering actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2020). Agricultural development and rural transformation in the Philippines. https://www.adb.org/publications

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2019). ASEAN guidelines on promoting responsible investment in food, agriculture and forestry. https://asean.org

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2021). ASEAN economic integration brief. https://asean.org

Bannor, R. K. (2024). A systematic review and bibliometric analysis on agribusiness gaps in emerging markets. Journal of Agribusiness in Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaem.2024

Banaszak, I. (2019). Economic performance of agricultural cooperatives in developing countries: The role of trust and governance. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 47(2), 89–110.

Chin, C. F., et al. (2024). Transforming food systems in Maritime Southeast Asia and Pacific small island developing states. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, Article 1304317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1304317

Davis, J., & Goldberg, R. (1957). A concept of agribusiness. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

Department of Agriculture. (2021). Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) annual report. Government of the Philippines. https://prdp.da.gov.ph

Department of Agriculture. (2022). Agricultural extension reforms in the Philippines. Government of the Philippines. https://www.da.gov.ph

Devaux, A., et al. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development. Journal of Agribusiness Development and Emerging Economies, 8(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-05-2017-0031

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). Inclusive value chains for sustainable agriculture and rural development. https://www.fao.org/publications

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. https://www.fao.org/publications

Goldsmith, O. (1985). Agribusiness and food systems: A conceptual overview. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 36(3), 245–259.

Hidayati, D. R., Garnevska, E., & Childerhouse, P. (2021). Sustainable agrifood value-chain transformation in developing countries: A framework. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212358

International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2021). Rural development report 2021: Transforming food systems for rural prosperity. https://www.ifad.org

International Food Policy Research Institute. (2018). Global food policy report 2018: Transformation of food systems. https://www.ifpri.org/publications

Lim, S. (2022). Global agricultural value chains and employment growth. Journal of Agribusiness & Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.34

Macaumbao, W. B., & Bandera, A. D. (2025). A review on financial management practices and their implications. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(3), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v4i3.5988

Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. (2015). Global value chains, power and competitiveness: The case of African horticulture. Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 123–135.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on agriculture and food markets in the Philippines. Government of the Philippines. https://psa.gov.ph

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). Employment in agriculture, forestry, and fishing sector. Government of the Philippines. https://psa.gov.ph

Reardon, T., & Timmer, C. P. (2014). Five inter-linked transformations in the Asian agrifood economy: Food security implications. Global Food Security, 3(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.02.001

Reardon, T., Echeverria, R., Berdegué, J., Minten, B., & Liverpool-Tasie, S. (2019). Rapid transformation of food systems in developing regions: Highlighting the role of agricultural research and innovations. Agricultural Systems, 172, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.022

Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture. (2020). Inclusive agribusiness growth in the Philippines: Lessons from Nestlé’s coffee value chain. https://www.searca.org/publications

Török, Á., Kovács, S., Jámbor, A., & Márk Maró, Z. (2025). Understanding the determinants of participation in agri-food global value chains. Journal of Sustainability Research, 7(3), e250062. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250062

Trienekens, J. H. (2011). Agricultural value chains in developing countries: A framework for analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(2), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.103987

World Bank. (2018). Vietnam: Transforming agriculture for higher value addition and competitiveness. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2020). Philippines agricultural public expenditure review. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2021). Enabling inclusive agricultural finance in developing countries. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org

Yeritsyan, A. (2024). Policies enhancing agricultural value chains in developing countries. Agriculture & Food Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afs.2024

Zhou, Y., et al. (2023). Building Climate-Resilient Food Systems In East And South-East Asia: Vulnerabilities, Responses And Financing. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE/2023492