Financial Intensity or Project Duration: What Drives Patents and Spin-Offs in Public R&D Projects?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jred.v3i2.1099Keywords:
R&D Projects, Innovation Outputs, Patents, Spin-Offs, Induced Private InvestmentAbstract
The aim of the research is to examine the aspects that govern the innovation outcomes of publicly funded Research and Development (R&D) projects at the project level, focusing on the intensity of funding, implementation period, and the resulting induced private investment. The empirical model relies on a sample of 1,435 projects in the Attica Region and approximates a log-linear econometric model with the OLS technique and heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors. The innovation performance is measured using the logarithm of the total number of patents and spin-offs generated by an individual project. The findings indicate that final project budget and induced private investment have a positive and statistically significant impact on innovation outcomes, with the largest impact being that of private leverage. Conversely, project implementation does not have an ordered contributor to patent and spin-off production.
References
Aiello, F., Albanese, G., & Piselli, P. (2019). Good value for public money? The case of R&D policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(6), 1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.02.006
Bruno, E., Castellano, R., & Punzo, G. (2026). Public funding and firm innovation: Evidence from Germany. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 105,102462.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102462
Busom, I., & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.002
Cheah, S. L. Y., & Ho, Y. P. (2020). Effective industrial policy implementation for open innovation: The role of government resources and capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119845
Croonen, E. P. M., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2025). Why not all “winners” are successful: Explaining project performance of publicly funded innovation consortia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 216, 124124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124124
Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2018). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1361010
European Commission. (2020). Science, research and innovation performance of the EU 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/publications/all-publications/science-research-and-innovation-performance-eu-2020_en
Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and Innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
Han, Y., Han, L., & Wang, Q. (2024). How does government R&D subsidies affect enterprises’ viability? An investigation on inverted U-shaped relationship. Finance Research Letters, 70, 106235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106235
Herrmann, A., Gassmann, O., & Eisert, U. (2007). An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1–2), 92–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.006
Herzer, D. (2025). The impact of government-funded renewable energy R&D on its consumption. Journal of Policy Modeling, 47 (5), 903-918.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.06.001
Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136–1164. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150808
Kolympiris, C., Kalaitzandonakes, N., & Miller, D. (2014). Public funds and local biotechnology firm creation. Research Policy, 43(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.012
Li, Q., Li, W., & Liu, J. (2025). Government subsidies and total factor productivity: The conflict between economic and social objectives. Finance Research Letters.85 (D), 108024.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108024
Link, A. N., & van Hasselt, M. (2019). A public sector knowledge production function. Economics Letters, 175, 64–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.025
Makryvelios, E., & Mavrotas, G. (2021a). Data for absorption, evaluation and effectiveness of R&D projects in Greece. Data in Brief, 37, 107273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107273
Makryvelios, E., & Mavrotas, G. (2021b). Analysis of the Research & Development funding in Greece under EU programs. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 11(1), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i1.18179
Mavrotas, G., & Makryvelios, E. (2021). Combining multiple criteria analysis, mathematical programming and Monte Carlo simulation to tackle uncertainty in research and development project portfolio selection: A case study from Greece. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(2), 794–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.051
Mavrotas, G., & Makryvelios, E. (2023). R&D project portfolio selection using the iterative trichotomic approach: Studying how subjectivity of weights is reflected in the selected projects of the final portfolio. Operational Research, 23, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00785-7
Meuleman, M., & De Maeseneire, W. (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing? Research Policy, 41(3), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.001
OECD. (2015). The innovation imperative: Contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2015/10/the-innovation-imperative_g1g583ba/9789264239814-en.pdf
Plank, J., & Doblinger, C. (2018). The firm-level innovation impact of public R&D funding: Evidence from the German renewable energy sector. Energy Policy, 113, 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.031
Shao, K., & Wang, X. (2023). Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100436
Spanos, Y. E., Vonortas, N. S., & Voudouris, I. (2015). Antecedents of innovation impacts in publicly funded collaborative R&D projects. Technovation, 36–37, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.010
Stone, V. I., & Lane, J. P. (2012). Modeling technology innovation: How science, engineering, and industry methods can combine to generate beneficial socioeconomic impacts. Implementation Science, 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-44
Torregrosa-Hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations: A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. Research Policy, 48(6), 1373–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
Wang, L., & Chen, M. (2026). Government subsidies, maturity mismatch of investment and financing, and ESG performance: A study about A-share listed new energy companies in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 106,104973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.104973
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727
Yu, A., Zhang, Q., Yu, R., & Cheng, Y. (2023). More is better or in waste? A resource allocation measure of government grants for facilitating firm innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 122918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122918
Zhang, L., Sun, M., Peng, Y., Zhao, W., Chen, L., & Huang, Y. (2022). How public investment fuels innovation: Clues from government-subsidized USPTO patents. Journal of Informetrics, 16(3), 101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101313
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Evangelos Makryvelios, Theodore Papadogonas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

