Unveiling The Nexus: Exploring the Impact of Behavioral Finance on Green Finance Initiatives

Authors

  • Rahul Chuahan Unitedworld Institute of Management, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
  • Kishan Chavda Unitedworld Institute of Management, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v1i2.181

Keywords:

Climate Finance, Public-Private Collaboration, Sustainable Development

Abstract

This research paper delves into the dynamic landscape of global climate finance during the fiscal years of 2021/2022, examining the collaborative efforts of public and private actors in addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. The equitable distribution of financial resources reflects a shared commitment to transformative action, with a focus on critical sectors such as energy, transport, and buildings and infrastructure. Both sectors emphasize the transition to renewable energy, sustainable transportation, and climate-resilient urban development. Public finance plays a pivotal role by directing support to relatively underserved sectors, including Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU), water and wastewater management, and industry. This targeted intervention ensures inclusivity in climate action and contributes to broader sustainable development goals. The financial commitments not only reduce carbon footprints but also foster innovation, job creation, and economic resilience. The collaborative model of climate finance observed during this period sets a precedent for future endeavors, emphasizing a holistic and inclusive approach. The research suggests potential avenues for future studies, such as assessing the long-term impact of climate finance, evaluating evolving patterns in public-private collaboration, and exploring the integration of climate finance within global policy frameworks. Ultimately, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on climate resilience, offering insights into the interconnectedness of financial commitments, sustainable development, and the global fight against climate change.

References

Baker, M., Ruback, R. S., & Wurgler, J. (2019). Behavioral Corporate Finance: The Life Cycle of a CEO Career. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(2), 344–367.

Barberis, N. (2013). Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–195.

Chami, R., Cosimano, T.F., Fullenkamp, C., 2002. Managing ethical risk: how investing in ethics adds value. J. Bank. Financ. 26, 1697–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00188-7.

He, L.Y., Zhang, L.H., Zhong, Z.Q., Wang, D.Q., Wang, F., 2019a. Green credit, renewable energy investment and green economy development: empirical analysis based on 150 listed companies of China. J. Clean. Prod. 208, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.119.

https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/global-landscape-of-climate-finance-2023/

Labatt, S., White, R., 2002. Environmental Finance: A Guide to Environmental Risk Assessment and Financial Products. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Canada.

Lee, C.C., Wang, C.W., 2021. Firms’ cash reserve, financial constraint, and geopolitical risk. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 65, 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pacfin.2020.101480.

Lee, C.C., Wang, C.W., Ho, S.J., 2020. Financial innovation and bank growth: the role of institutional environments. N. Am. J. Econ. Financ. 53, 101195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101195.

Liu, S.Y., Wen, S.Y., 2019. Should financial institutions be environmentally responsible in China? Facts, theory and evidence. Econ. Res. J. 54 (3), 38–54. CNKI:SUN: JJYJ.0.2019-03-004.

Liu, T.Y., Lee, C.C., 2020. Convergence of the world’s energy use. Resour. Energy Econ. 62, 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101199.

Niu, H.P., Zhang, X.Y., Zhang, P.D., 2020. Institutional change and effect evaluation of green finance policy in China: evidence from green credit policy. Manag. Rev. 32 (8), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2020.08.001.

Ren, X.D., Shao, Qinglong, Zhong, R.Y., 2020. Nexus between green finance, non-fossil energy use, and carbon intensity: empirical evidence from China based on a vector error correction model. J. Clean. Prod. 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.122844.

Salazar, J., 1998. Environmental finance – linking two worlds: financiers' perceptions on biodiversity conservation and clean technology projects – the Peruvian case. In: Paper Presented at the Workshop on Financial Innovations for Biodiversity (Bratislava, Slovakia), pp. 2–18 (1).

Scholtens, B., 2006. Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 68 (1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9037-1.

Statman, M. (2004). Behavioral Finance: Past Battles and Future Engagements. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(6), 10–17.

Thomas, S., Repetto, R., et al., 2007. Integrated environmental and financial performance metrics for investment analysis and portfolio management. Corp. Gov. 15 (3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00575.x.

Wang, Y., Zhi, Q., 2016. The role of green finance in environmental protection: two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia 104, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053.

Wang, Y.L., Ma, Y., Wang, S.C., Liu, Y.T., Ye, M., 2011. Establishment and development of green financial system of China. Finance & Trade Economics 10, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.19795/j.cnki.cn111166/f.2011.10.006.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Chuahan, R., & Chavda, K. (2024). Unveiling The Nexus: Exploring the Impact of Behavioral Finance on Green Finance Initiatives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v1i2.181

Issue

Section

Articles