Structural Vulnerabilities by Design: An Institutional Analysis of Zhengzhou's Multi-Level Warning and Risk Communication System Prior to the 2021 Urban Flood of China

Authors

  • Ma Wangling Thammasat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v3i3.1196

Keywords:

Institutional Design, Early Warning Systems, Risk Communication, Structural Tensions, Urban Flood Governance, Zhengzhou of China

Abstract

The design of multi-level warning and risk communication systems is a critical but analytically underexplored dimension of urban flood governance. Using a qualitative institutional document analysis design, this study reconstructs how Zhengzhou's warning and risk communication system was formally structured to function across eight governance levels (L1–L8) prior to the extreme rainfall event of July 2021. Drawing on the Emergency Response Law, national meteorological regulations, and the Zhengzhou Municipal Urban Flood Control Emergency Plan, the study identifies four structural tensions embedded in the institutional design. First, the "Tiao-Kuai" divide between warning issuance and emergency response activation as institutionally separate systems. Second, the gap between framework-level contingency plans and the operational precision required by extreme events. Third, long vertical transmission chains combined with insufficient horizontal coordination mechanisms. Fourth, the absence of institutionalized public feedback loops from the receiving end of the communication chain. These tensions did not individually determine system failure, but together constituted specific institutional pressure points that shaped the conditions under which governance capacity would be tested under extreme climate stress. These findings contribute to understanding how institutional design in hierarchical governance systems can embed structural vulnerabilities that remain latent until activated by extreme events, offering direct implications for flood governance reform in Chinese cities and rapidly urbanizing contexts across the Asia-Pacific region facing intensifying climate risks.

References

Berikut adalah daftar pustaka yang telah dirapikan dengan memberikan jarak (enter) di setiap pergantian baris referensinya, tanpa mengubah isi di dalamnya:

Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Basher, R. (2006). Global early warning systems for natural hazards: Systematic and people-centred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 364(1845), 2167–2182. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1819

Baudoin, M.-A., Henly-Shepard, S., Fernando, N., Sitati, A., & Zommers, Z. (2016). From top-down to "community-centric" approaches to early warning systems: Exploring pathways to improve disaster risk reduction through community participation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0085-6

Birkland, T. A. (2009). Disasters, lessons learned, and fantasy documents. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(3), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00570.x

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356

Chen, Z., & Kong, F. (2022). 河南郑州"7·20"特大暴雨洪涝灾害应急管理碎片化及综合治理研究 [Research on emergency management fragmentation and integrated governance of the "7·20" catastrophic rainstorm and flood disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan]. 水利水电技术(中英文) [Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering], 53(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.08.001

China Meteorological Administration. (2007). 气象灾害预警信号发布与传播办法 [Measures for the issuance and dissemination of meteorological disaster warning signals]. http://www.cma.gov.cn

Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (Eds.). (2010). Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity: Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x

Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019

Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

Fu, G., Zhang, C., Hall, J. W., & Butler, D. (2023). Are sponge cities the solution to China's growing urban flooding problems? WIREs Water, 10(1), Article e1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1613

He, G. (2024). 极端自然灾害事件中政府预警机制的研究——以河南郑州"7·20"特大暴雨灾害为例 [Research on government warning mechanisms in extreme natural disaster events: A case study of the Zhengzhou "7·20" rainstorm disaster] [Master's thesis, Zhejiang Provincial Party School of the Communist Party of China]. https://doi.org/10.27478/d.cnki.gzzjd.2022.000020

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005280605

Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x

Liu, Z., & Christensen, T. (2022). The long-term development of crisis management in China: Continuity, institutional punctuations and reforms. Review of Policy Research, 39(3), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12455

Liu, Z., & Zhu, Z. (2021). China's pathway to domestic emergency management: Unpacking the characteristics in system evolution. Politics & Policy, 49(3), 619–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12407

Mileti, D. S., & Sorensen, J. H. (1990). Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment (Report No. ORNL-6609). Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

Shi, C., & Xie, C. (2024). Institutional vulnerability to urban flood risk management: A case study of the 7·20 flooding disaster in Zhengzhou, China. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(2), Article e12515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12585

Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008

Sorensen, J. H. (2000). Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119

Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2007). 中华人民共和国突发事件应对法 [Emergency Response Law of the People's Republic of China]. https://www.npc.gov.cn/

Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2024). 中华人民共和国突发事件应对法(修订) [Emergency Response Law of the People's Republic of China, revised]. Adopted 28 June 2024; effective 1 November 2024. https://www.npc.gov.cn/

State Council Investigation Group. (2022). 河南郑州"7·20"特大暴雨灾害调查报告 [Investigation report on the "7·20" catastrophic rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan Province]. Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China. https://www.mem.gov.cn/gk/sgcc/tbzdsgdcbg/202201/P020220121639049697767.pdf

Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618

Wang, D., Liu, G., Wang, H., Huang, J., & Wang, Y. (2025). Characteristics and adaptive structure of urban flood governance network: The "July 20th" flooding event in Zhengzhou, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 122, Article 105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105465

World Meteorological Organization. (2024). State of climate in Asia 2023. WMO. https://library.wmo.int/records/item/68890-state-of-the-climate-in-asia-2023

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yu, H., Chen, X., Liu, C., Mu, J., & Chai, F. (2022). 郑州中心城区2021年“7·20”特大暴雨洪涝复盘模拟分析 [Retrospective simulation and analysis on "7·20" extreme rainstorm and flood in central urban area of Zhengzhou City]. 中国防汛抗旱 [China Flood & Drought Management], 32(5), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2022145

Zeng, C., Aboagye, E. M., Li, H., & Che, S. (2023). Comments and recommendations on Sponge City — China's solutions to prevent flooding risks. Heliyon, 9(1), Article e12745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12745

Zhengzhou Municipal People's Government. (2019). 郑州市城市防洪应急预案 [Zhengzhou Municipal Urban Flood Control Emergency Plan]. Zhengzhou Municipal People's Government.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Wangling, M. (2026). Structural Vulnerabilities by Design: An Institutional Analysis of Zhengzhou’s Multi-Level Warning and Risk Communication System Prior to the 2021 Urban Flood of China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 3(3), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v3i3.1196

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.