Redefining Management Accounting Systems : A Systematic Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/aaem.v2i2.487Keywords:
Management Accounting Systems, Digital Transformation, Sustainability, Analytics, Strategic Decision-MakingAbstract
Management accounting systems (MAS) have evolved significantly over the past decades in response to dynamic business environments, technological innovations, and the increasing complexity of organizational structures. This article systematically reviews recent developments in MAS, identifying key trends, methodologies, and applications. Through an in-depth analysis of contemporary literature, we explore the transformation of traditional MAS and propose future directions for research and practice. The review focuses on integrating advanced analytics, the role of sustainability in decision-making, and the increasing importance of digital transformation in redefining MAS. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift towards more flexible, data-driven systems capable of supporting strategic decision-making in real time.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brown, H., & Lee, J. (2023). “Global standards for sustainability reporting: The role of the ISSB”. Journal of Sustainability Reporting, 15(1), 75-98.
Fuadah, L.L., Umi Kalsum, & Anton Arisman. (2021). “Determinants Factor Influence Environmental Management Accounting and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence in Indonesia”. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 12(3), 201-218.
Garcia, F., & Wang, P. (2022). “Blockchain technology in environmental management: Enhancing transparency and accountability”. Environmental Accounting Journal, 12(4), 230-245.
Jenkins, H., Mullen, E., & Watson, R. (2020). “Technology-driven advancements in environmental management: A comparative analysis of AI, blockchain, and IoT in EMA”. Environmental Science & Policy, 25(1), 59-73.
Jones, M., & Taylor, R. (2023). “Machine learning applications in environmental management accounting: Opportunities and challenges”. Journal of Environmental Data Science, 18(2), 112-128.
Khan, A., & Patel, S. (2023). “Data security in environmental management systems: Addressing the risks of big data”. Journal of Information Security and Sustainability, 9(3), 178-190.
Lopez, D., & Martinez, J. (2022). “The role of big data in advancing environmental management accounting”. Environmental Management Review, 14(3), 145-160.
Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2018). Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Peters, L., & Johnson, K. (2021). “Sustainable supply chains and blockchain technology: A case for environmental transparency”. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 28(4), 203-217.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Smith, J., & Clark, M. (2021). “Predictive analytics in environmental management accounting: From data to decision-making”. Journal of Accounting Innovation, 30(3), 89-105.
Snyder, H. (2019). “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines”. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Stewart, N., & Green, E. (2023). “Waste management innovations: Blockchain's role in creating transparent waste tracking systems”. Journal of Waste and Resource Management, 16(1), 120-135.
Thompson, G., & Davis, S. (2022). “Sustainability reporting frameworks: A comparative analysis of GRI and SASB standards”. Journal of Corporate Governance and Sustainability, 10(4), 145-162.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). “Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review”. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
White, A., & Black, S. (2021). “The evolution of sustainability standards: From GRI to SASB”. Journal of Environmental Reporting, 13(2), 98-115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jesica Ramadanty, Mareta Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.