Employee Competence and the Effectiveness of the Integrated Internal Control System (SPIT): Mediating Effects of Leadership Commitment and the Moderating Role of Risk Management Maturity

Authors

  • Suryani Putri Albinar Bandar Lampung University
  • Luke Suciati Amna Bandar Lampung University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/aaem.v3i2.1072

Keywords:

Employee Competence, Leadership Commitment, Risk Management Maturity, Internal Control System, SPIT Effectiveness

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of employee competence on the effectiveness of the Integrated Internal Control System (SPIT) at the Regional Office of the Directorate General of Treasury of Lampung Province, with leadership commitment as a mediating variable and risk management maturity as a moderating variable. The research employed a quantitative explanatory approach using a survey method. Primary data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 36 employees who had participated in SPIT socialization activities, and the sampling technique used was saturated sampling. Data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS version 3.8. The results show that employee competence has a positive and significant effect on SPIT effectiveness. Employee competence also has a positive and significant effect on leadership commitment, while leadership commitment positively and significantly influences SPIT effectiveness. Furthermore, leadership commitment partially mediates the relationship between employee competence and SPIT effectiveness. The findings also indicate that risk management maturity moderates the relationship between employee competence and SPIT effectiveness, strengthening the influence of employee competence on internal control effectiveness. These results highlight the importance of improving employee competence, strengthening leadership commitment, and enhancing risk management maturity to achieve effective implementation of SPIT in public sector organizations.

References

[https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818774550](https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818774550)

[https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94043](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94043)

[https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1656](https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1656)

[https://doi.org/10.47233/jebs.v4i6.2150](https://doi.org/10.47233/jebs.v4i6.2150)

Abubakar Tackbir, R. R. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pegawai Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandung. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 24(1), 17–32. [https://journal.stialanmakassar.ac.id](https://journal.stialanmakassar.ac.id)

Alzeban, A., & Sawan, N. (2020). The role of internal audit function in public sector governance. International Journal of Auditing, 24(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12181

Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2021). Enterprise risk management implementation in public organizations. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1769315

Bay, P. G., & Tunti, M. E. D. (2019). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah Terhadap Efektivitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (Studi Kasus pada Badan Keuangan Daerah Kota Kupang). Jurnal Akuntansi: Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas, 7(2), 138–147.

Bungin, B. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kencana.

Collins, B. J., Galvin, B. M., & Meyer, R. D. (2019). Situational Strength as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Organizational Identification and Work Outcomes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(1), 87–97.

COSO. (2023). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2020). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(2–3), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.102128

Fikri, R., Astuty, W., & Sari, M. (2024). Pengaruh Kompetensi SDM, SPIP, Dan Pemanfaatan TI Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating Pada OPD Kota Tanjung Balai. Jurnal Ekonomika Dan Bisnis (JEBS), 4(6), 1708–1714.

Hiebl, M. R. W., & Mayrleitner, B. (2021). Professionalization of risk management in public sector organizations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(4), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0016

Indriani, R., & Siswantoro, D. (2023). Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) pada Satuan Kerja X. Owner, 7(4), 3006–3017.

Ira Aniswara, Mughni Latifah, & Muhtazib, M. (2025). Pengaruh Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia terhadap Efektivitas Kerja Pegawai pada Dinas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Kabupaten Gowa. POINT: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 7(1), 92–102. [https://doi.org/10.46918/point.v7i1.2711](https://doi.org/10.46918/point.v7i1.2711)

Ismail, T., Widagdo, A. K., & Widodo, A. (2022). Internal control systems and public sector accountability. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(3), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2021-0040

Jeanet Muntu, S., & Ismunandar, I. (2024). Peran Teknologi dalam Meningkatkan Keamanan dan Efisiensi Pengendalian Internal. Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 3(4), 1029–1040.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2005). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Kewo, C. L., & Afiah, N. N. (2021). Does internal control improve public sector performance? Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-07-2020-0059

Lenz, R., Sarens, G., & D’Silva, K. (2020). Probing the usefulness of internal audit. International Journal of Auditing, 24(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12170

Mikes, A., & Kaplan, R. S. (2020). Towards a contingency theory of enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12400

OECD. (2020). Internal control and risk management in public sector governance. OECD Publishing.

Oulasvirta, L., & Anttiroiko, A. V. (2021). Governance and risk management in public organizations. Public Management Review, 23(6), 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1798123

Petrovits, C., Shakespeare, C., & Shih, A. (2021). The causes and consequences of internal control problems. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 337–367. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0516

Puspitasari, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Risk management maturity and internal control effectiveness. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 20(2), 155–171.

Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2021). Business intelligence and internal control systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 40, 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100499

Steinbart, P. J., Raschke, R. L., Gal, G., & Dilla, W. N. (2020). The influence of internal control on firm performance. Accounting Horizons, 34(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52564

Syarief, A. (2020). Analisis Implementasi Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Pada Pemerintah Daerah Kota Cimahi. Implementation of Government Internal Control System in Cimahi City, 1(1), 45–52.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Albinar, S. P., & Amna, L. S. (2025). Employee Competence and the Effectiveness of the Integrated Internal Control System (SPIT): Mediating Effects of Leadership Commitment and the Moderating Role of Risk Management Maturity. Journal of Advances in Accounting, Economics, and Management, 3(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/aaem.v3i2.1072

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.